![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.constructionplantworld.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Carillion-Infographic-slimline.jpg\")
<\/p>\nA snap poll of Carillion engineering sub-contractors shows that many companies are facing huge financial losses from the collapse of the construction giant. That\u2019s according to new data obtained by the Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) and the electrotechnical and engineering services trade body ECA.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Carillion owes around \u00a375 million to around 80 engineering services firms, who provide vital services such as electrical, plumbing, gas, fire and security, and heating and ventilation. The overall losses are likely to be far higher, given there are thousands of businesses operating in the industry. The engineering services sector is the largest part of the construction industry by value.<\/p>\n
The ECA and BESA survey shows that contractors of all sizes have been affected by Carillion\u2019s demise:<\/p>\n
On Wednesday, BESA and ECA met with liquidator PwC and the Government. PwC said any private sector work undertaken by Carillion suppliers before 15 January this year would be unpaid. Instead, it would be treated as \u2018unsecured debt\u2019, and placed at the back of the queue behind other creditors.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe knew the fall-out from this seismic episode would be extremely serious, but these figures give us a clearer picture of just how hard our sector is going to hit in terms of the thousands of pounds of unsecured debt that will be lost\u00a0by ordinary hard working small businesses, jeopardising their future and the future of their staff\u201d<\/em>, said BESA President Tim Hopkinson<\/strong>.<\/p>\n \u201cThese findings underline the need for concerted action from the Government and banks to protect and support SMEs in the construction and services sector. The Government should also introduce legal measures to ensure SMEs are not continually exposed to upstream insolvency\u201d,<\/em> commented ECA Director of Business Paul Reeve<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Both ECA and BESA have long called for reform to unfair payment practices within construction. Carillion was widely known to take over four months to pay suppliers, despite 30 day payment being industry good practice. To tackle this slow payment, the two trade bodies are calling on the Government to pay small and medium-sized businesses directly, using \u2018project bank accounts\u2019.<\/p>\n BESA and ECA are also supporting a Bill tabled by Peter Aldous MP, which is currently going through Parliament. The Bill will prevent clients and main contractors, such as Carillion, from using their own accounts to store money held back from suppliers in case of defects \u2013 ring-fenced, independent accounts would be used instead.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"